


"Like Resident Evil 2 before it, Resident Evil 3’s 2020 remake does an amazing job of recapturing the horror and tension of the late ‘90s original while completely modernizing its gameplay. IGN, on the other hand, were very positive about the single-player aspect of Resident Evil 3, highlighting its "glorious detail" and "smart level design", rewarding the game with a 9/10 score: But even though your feet are cosy, it never feels like home." It’s gorgeous to look at, the jump scares will get you, and it’s like stepping into a comfy pair of slippers. "It’s still worth playing, but Resident Evil 3 Remake is a step backwards for Capcom, coming off the back of one of the best games of last year. VG247 echoed similar thoughts, suggesting the game was "a step backwards" from Resident Evil 2, but also praising its "gorgeous" visuals and effective jump scares. It's still an experience very much worth revisiting, with Raccoon City and the hospital receiving a lot of love and attention, however, it only makes us question what could have been that little bit more."

"Resident Evil 3 had the potential to better its classic predecessor, but a disappointing amount of cut content and the let down that is Nemesis hold it back from greatness. In their review, they mentioned pros including "excellent gunplay" and "phenomenal visuals", while also criticising "a lot of cut content": We'll start over at sister site Push Square, who gave the game a 7/10. Some critics are suggesting they aren't as impressed as they were with the Resident Evil 2 remake, however, so let's take a look at what a few reviewers have been saying about the game so far. The first reviews for Resident Evil 3 have gone live, and for the most part, they're looking very positive.
